<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moved Blog Alert!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jackkeifer.com/moved-blog-alert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jackkeifer.com/moved-blog-alert/</link>
	<description>Online Marketing, 101</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:51:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.jackkeifer.com/moved-blog-alert/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackkeifer.com/moved-blog-alert/#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Matia, it will be interesting to see how it plays out.  I&#039;m sure James has the research data to back up his intentions.  I have the .org version of my domain as well but it&#039;s sitting idle with a 301 redirect.  Perhaps someday it will be wise to follow suit?  Hmmmm, time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matia, it will be interesting to see how it plays out.  I&#8217;m sure James has the research data to back up his intentions.  I have the .org version of my domain as well but it&#8217;s sitting idle with a 301 redirect.  Perhaps someday it will be wise to follow suit?  Hmmmm, time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matia</title>
		<link>http://www.jackkeifer.com/moved-blog-alert/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Matia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackkeifer.com/moved-blog-alert/#comment-223</guid>
		<description>I am nobody, but I do buy James&#039; products. Yes, .org is more significant to Google now than .com. I am still shocked by James&#039; move to .org, but I am sure with his army of interns he will gather enough links to surpass his old .com. I am watching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am nobody, but I do buy James&#8217; products. Yes, .org is more significant to Google now than .com. I am still shocked by James&#8217; move to .org, but I am sure with his army of interns he will gather enough links to surpass his old .com. I am watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.jackkeifer.com/moved-blog-alert/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackkeifer.com/moved-blog-alert/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>Good point, Stephen.  Yahoo! &amp; MSN are certainly a significant factor which shouldn&#039;t be overlooked.  Being that he&#039;s not ranked in the top ten of Yahoo!, it does makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Stephen.  Yahoo! &#038; MSN are certainly a significant factor which shouldn&#8217;t be overlooked.  Being that he&#8217;s not ranked in the top ten of Yahoo!, it does makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.jackkeifer.com/moved-blog-alert/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jackkeifer.com/moved-blog-alert/#comment-221</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Perhaps a .org domain carries more weight as an authority site in the eyes of Google?

My guess is that .org carries more weight with MSN or Yahoo.  He&#039;s not ranked in the top 10 on Yahoo! now for Internet Business, he probably will be soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;Perhaps a .org domain carries more weight as an authority site in the eyes of Google?</p>
<p>My guess is that .org carries more weight with MSN or Yahoo.  He&#8217;s not ranked in the top 10 on Yahoo! now for Internet Business, he probably will be soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
